Topic summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Delays results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 1,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,422 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (2,931 of 15,447 topics). This Delays is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Delays
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠81%Delays (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,422
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.0% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 34.7%34.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 34.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Special Pleading: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos