Topic summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deforestation results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Slippery Slope, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 2,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,838 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,365 of 16,562 topics). This Deforestation is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Deforestation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,838
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos