Topic summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Minister results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,663 of 16,562 topics). This Defense Minister is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Defense Minister
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.1%16.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.7%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos