Topic summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Authorization Bill results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65.3% saturation with 1,920 hits . Analysis detected 12,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,942 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of ā 97% (633 of 16,562 topics). This Defense Authorization Bill is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group. Defense Authorization Bill
Topic details
Total words: 2,942
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.2% percentile 14.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0ā75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 65.3% 65.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 32.1% 32.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 34.3% 34.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 49.8% 49.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 22.6% 22.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 16.4% 16.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 33.7% 33.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 24.8% 24.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 19.0% 19.0% Fundamental Attribution E⦠Sitewide 2.7% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 65.3%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 49.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 34.3%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 33.7%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 32.1%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Tu Quoque: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst