Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 10,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense And Military Forces results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 3,001 hits . Analysis detected 21,879 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,928 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (15,304 of 16,562 topics). This Defense And Military Forces is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Defense And Military Forces
Topic details
Total words: 31,928
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles31.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst