Topic summary
37% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defamation results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 2,618 hits . Analysis detected 24,233 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,748 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,715 of 15,447 topics). This Defamation is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. Defamation
Topic details
Total words: 27,748
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score10 analyzed articles27.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst