Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Nover results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.1% and a BS Rank of 99% (107 of 6,262 authors). This Scott Nover is worse (more manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Scott Nover
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
99%Scott Nover (selected)18%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 312
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510098.3% percentile
17.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles312 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 23.7%23.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 12.2%12.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.2%12.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 23.7%23.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 25.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 23.7%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 23.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos