Topic summary
⁠31%4 analyzed articles/videos1,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deepfakes results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 1,317 hits. Analysis detected 10,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,064 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (15,770 of 16,562 topics). This Deepfakes is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Deepfakes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 17,064
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751004.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos