Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Deep State results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 1,473 hits. Analysis detected 11,628 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Deep State is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Deep State
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,515
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.5%32.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 32.6%32.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 30.2%30.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 16.5%16.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Topic 32.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos