Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deep Sea Exploration results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 713 hits. Analysis detected 4,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,030 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,270 of 16,562 topics). This Deep Sea Exploration is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Deep Sea Exploration
Topic details
Total words: 7,030
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos