Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Decline Of Empires results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,493 hits. Analysis detected 11,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,773 of 16,562 topics). This Decline Of Empires is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Decline Of Empires
Topic details
Total words: 8,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.6%13.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos