Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Debt Sustainability results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 275 hits. Analysis detected 3,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,444 of 16,562 topics). This Debt Sustainability is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Debt Sustainability
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠74%Debt Sustainability (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 9.6%9.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos