Topic summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos1,467 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Debated Sensitive Social Issues results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 875 hits. Analysis detected 3,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,868 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,426 of 16,558 topics). This Debated Sensitive Social Issues is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Debated Sensitive Social Issues
Topic details
Total words: 5,868
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.9%14.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos