Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dc Politics results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 2,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,009 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,136 of 16,562 topics). This Dc Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Dc Politics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,009
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos