Topic summary
ā 73%1 analyzed article/video1,039 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daylight Savings Time results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 2,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,117 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ā 57% (7,123 of 16,562 topics). This Daylight Savings Time is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Daylight Savings Time
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 57%Daylight Savings Time (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,117
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.8%6.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos