Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video610 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daycare Scandal results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 601 hits. Analysis detected 3,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,640 of 16,562 topics). This Daycare Scandal is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Daycare Scandal
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,440
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.6%24.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.5%9.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos