Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video410 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Bilchitz results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 1,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,536 of 16,446 topics). This David Bilchitz is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
David Bilchitz
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.4% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.5%18.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos