Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,353 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Strategy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 899 hits . Analysis detected 5,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (9,179 of 16,562 topics). This Data Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group. Data Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 5,412
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 16.6% 16.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.0% 12.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst