Topic summary
99% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Brokers results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 2,277 hits . Analysis detected 14,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,949 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 85% (2,629 of 16,559 topics). This Data Brokers is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Data Brokers
Topic details
Total words: 5,949
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.1% percentile 6.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 38.3% 38.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 20.9% 20.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 16.6% 16.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 16.9% 16.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 21.3% 21.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 31.0% 31.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 38.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 31.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 29.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst