Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Whitehead results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 54.2% saturation with 1,982 hits . Analysis detected 9,565 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of â 96% (302 of 6,628 authors). This John Whitehead is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. John Whitehead
Author details
Total words: 3,660
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.5% percentile 10.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 54.1% 54.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 30.2% 30.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 43.4% 43.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 25.0% 25.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 39.7% 39.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 20.6% 20.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.7% 12.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Author 54.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 43.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 39.7%, sitewide 26.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 30.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 25.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 20.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst