Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darializa Avila Chevalier results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 2,268 hits. Analysis detected 8,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,887 of 16,562 topics). This Darializa Avila Chevalier is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Darializa Avila Chevalier
Topic details
Total words: 7,624
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.8%29.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos