Topic summary
â 79% 1 analyzed article/video 1,874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dare To Dream results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 1,158 hits . Analysis detected 5,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,622 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of â 36% (10,662 of 16,562 topics). This Dare To Dream is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group. Dare To Dream
Topic details
Total words: 5,622
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 20.6% 20.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst