Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Osborn results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Genetic Fallacy, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 66.5% saturation with 1,664 hits. Analysis detected 7,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,503 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,216 of 16,562 topics). This Dan Osborn is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Dan Osborn
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,503
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.7% percentile
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 66.5%66.5%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 23.3%23.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 39.1%39.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.3%22.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 17.3%17.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 16.5%16.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.3%23.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.1%14.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 66.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 39.1%, sitewide 19.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Horn Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Special Pleading: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos