Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cameron Cawthorne results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 49.9% saturation with 2,368 hits. Analysis detected 13,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,747 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 91% (595 of 6,628 authors). This Cameron Cawthorne is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Cameron Cawthorne
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
91%Cameron Cawthorne (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,747
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510091.0% percentile
7.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 49.9%49.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 39.5%39.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 20.7%20.7%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 16.8%16.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 26.0%26.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 9.1%9.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 15.2%15.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Author 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Author 49.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 39.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 26.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Author 20.7%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Author 16.8%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Horn Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate