Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cameron Cawthorne results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 49.9% saturation with 2,368 hits . Analysis detected 13,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,747 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 91% (595 of 6,628 authors). This Cameron Cawthorne is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. Cameron Cawthorne
Author details
Total words: 4,747
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.0% percentile 7.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 49.9% 49.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 39.5% 39.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 20.7% 20.7% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 16.8% 16.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 26.0% 26.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.1% 9.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.2% 15.2% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 49.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 39.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 26.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 20.7%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 16.8%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Horn Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst