Topic summary
31% 1 analyzed article/video 744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Damage results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 308 hits . Analysis detected 1,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 50% (8,315 of 16,562 topics). This Damage is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Damage
Topic details
Total words: 2,976
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst