Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Custody Deaths results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 956 hits. Analysis detected 3,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,122 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,752 of 16,562 topics). This Custody Deaths is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Custody Deaths
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,122
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 23.2%23.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos