Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,067 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Curriculum Development results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,635 hits. Analysis detected 15,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,268 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (10,038 of 16,562 topics). This Curriculum Development is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Curriculum Development
Topic details
Total words: 12,268
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos