Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Currency Intervention results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 230 hits. Analysis detected 1,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 944 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,816 of 16,266 topics). This Currency Intervention is worse (more manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group.
Currency Intervention
Topic details
Total words: 944
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.8% percentile
8.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles944 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.7%15.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.0%10.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 24.4%24.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 10.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos