Topic summary
50%1 analyzed article/video338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Currency Exchange Rates results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 712 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,014 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 84% (2,747 of 16,562 topics). This Currency Exchange Rates is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Currency Exchange Rates
Topic details
Total words: 1,014
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 20.9%20.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 20.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos