Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Curling results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 5,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,561 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,892 of 16,562 topics). This Curling is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Curling
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,561
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos