Topic summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culinary Trends results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 1,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,310 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,591 of 16,235 topics). This Culinary Trends is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Culinary Trends
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,310
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos