Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culinary Collaborations results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 796 hits. Analysis detected 4,559 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ā 67% (5,557 of 16,562 topics). This Culinary Collaborations is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Culinary Collaborations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 67%Culinary Collaborations (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.2%24.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos