Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video550 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cuba U S Relations results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 637 hits. Analysis detected 2,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,330 of 16,562 topics). This Cuba U S Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Cuba U S Relations
Topic details
Total words: 2,200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.9% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.2%14.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos