Topic summary
⁠10%2 analyzed articles/videos1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cryptocurrency Theft results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 2,910 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,109 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,547 of 16,562 topics). This Cryptocurrency Theft is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Cryptocurrency Theft
Topic details
Total words: 5,109
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos