Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cryptocurrency Scams results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 284 hits. Analysis detected 2,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,319 of 16,562 topics). This Cryptocurrency Scams is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Cryptocurrency Scams
Topic details
Total words: 4,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos