Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crypto results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,135 hits . Analysis detected 6,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,930 of 16,558 topics). This Crypto is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Crypto
Topic details
Total words: 6,944
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.4% 16.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst