Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crowdfunding results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 1,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,110 of 16,562 topics). This Crowdfunding is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Crowdfunding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.1%13.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos