Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crowd Size Claims results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,559 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,473 of 16,562 topics). This Crowd Size Claims is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Crowd Size Claims
Topic details
Total words: 1,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.0% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos