Topic summary
ā 68%1 analyzed article/video530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crowd Dynamics results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 439 hits. Analysis detected 2,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ā 63% (6,256 of 16,562 topics). This Crowd Dynamics is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Crowd Dynamics
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 63%Crowd Dynamics (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.7%20.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos