Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,090 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crop Prices results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 39.4% saturation with 1,287 hits . Analysis detected 5,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,270 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,508 of 16,562 topics). This Crop Prices is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Crop Prices
Topic details
Total words: 3,270
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.9% percentile 9.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 39.4% 39.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 37.3% 37.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 16.6% 16.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Topic 39.4%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 37.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 26.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst