Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video1,741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Critique Of US Empire results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 1,638 hits. Analysis detected 9,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,223 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,111 of 16,562 topics). This Critique Of US Empire is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Critique Of US Empire
Topic details
Total words: 5,223
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 31.4%31.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.7%23.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 14.8%14.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.2%20.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 31.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos