Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Critical Infrastructure Protection results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 611 hits. Analysis detected 4,079 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,457 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Critical Infrastructure Protection is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Topic details
Total words: 2,457
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.3%19.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 24.9%24.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.0%17.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.0%7.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos