Topic summary
⁠49%3 analyzed articles/videos5,636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crisis & Conflict Management results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 2,375 hits. Analysis detected 21,615 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,536 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (13,371 of 15,399 topics). This Crisis & Conflict Management is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Crisis & Conflict Management
Topic details
Total words: 27,536
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles27.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos