Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Criminal Trial results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,034 hits. Analysis detected 7,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,247 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (10,485 of 15,620 topics). This Criminal Trial is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Criminal Trial
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,247
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos