Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Criminal Investigations results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 755 hits. Analysis detected 3,724 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,772 topics). This Criminal Investigations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Criminal Investigations
Topic details
Total words: 4,544
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.6%16.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos