Topic summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video1,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cricket In Detroit results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 612 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,771 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (16,389 of 16,558 topics). This Cricket In Detroit is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
Cricket In Detroit
Topic details
Total words: 3,771
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

1% percentile
02550751001.0% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos