Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Creative Differences results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Anecdotal, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 1,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,897 of 16,562 topics). This Creative Differences is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Creative Differences
Topic details
Total words: 1,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 21.1%21.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos