Topic summary
36%2 analyzed articles/videos418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cpu Pricing results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 579 hits. Analysis detected 3,748 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,269 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (9,107 of 16,562 topics). This Cpu Pricing is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Cpu Pricing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,269
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate