Author summary
82% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hassam Nasir results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 754 hits . Analysis detected 5,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,446 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,785 of 6,628 authors). This Hassam Nasir is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. Hassam Nasir
Author details
Total words: 4,446
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.5% 14.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.9% 7.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.7% 14.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.7%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst