Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Country Longevity results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 2,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,826 of 16,194 topics). This Country Longevity is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Country Longevity
Topic details
Total words: 2,920
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos